George Osborne

Given that the Evening Standard's editor signed off the government funding for this folly (in his previous job) it would be surprising if the subsequent scrapping were to be welcomed with open arms. There was an opinion column in it today, from the Chairman of the Trust which was not only somewhat inaccurate (in its assertions that it would be "open all year" but also, rather worryingly given his position, (and his former experience as chairman of a major bank) he doesn't seem to understand the "sunk cost" fallacy.

Trees

Even with a high maintenance budget, keeping trees as large as those in the artists' impression alive in such a location would have been a challenge, with the inevitably shallow roots (because they're on a bridge!) depriving them of both stability and nourishment - not to mention that any Thames bridge can get quite windy.

Henry VIII

Before Henry VIII's privatised the monasteries (by selling them off) he first had to nationalise them (by seizing them from the Church)

SWT

SWT was one of three franchises due to start on the same day in Feb 1996. The very first privatised service was a rail replacement bus from Fishguard. The Great Western franchise was bought out by First Group (who already had a minority holding in it) in 1998 and the franchise, now expanded, is still in the same ownership today.

The second franchise to start up would have been a management buyout of the Essex Thameside services, but the franchise was halted literally the evening before startup after the managers in question were found to be involved in accounting irregularities which improved the franchise's financial position at the expense of London Transport. This left SWT to run the very first privatised passenger train.

Waterloo

Waterloo's congestion problems would be a lot less if they announced platform numbers more promptly. The present practice of leaving it until the last minute results in congestion on the concourse as people wait for their train to be announced, and a mad scrum at the barriers when it is finally called, (not to mention the conflicts with people arriving off the train) and because the train is due to depart so soon people naturally jump on the nearest carriage, meaning that people getting to the platform a little later can't get on at the rear and haven't got time to get further down the train, thus getting left behind and having to wait for another train, further adding to the congestion on the concourse.

It is simply not credible that the people responsible for the departure screens do not know which platform a train is to go from until it arrives. (And if a late change is necessary, it would be much easier to manage if the concourse is not clogged up with people).